In both
educational discourse and popular psychology, the notion of left brain and
right brain dominance has been prevalent since the early 1980’s. A ramification
of this thinking was the idea that some people are more “creative” while others
are more “logical.” In the field of music, it is important to recognize what
parts of our brain are active while we perform and listen to different aspects
of music. Jourdain suggests that rhythm is lateralized in the left hemisphere
of the brain, while pitch perception is seated in the right side of the brain.
This idea seems to be an oversimplification and reductionist view of the
matter. In reality, both hemispheres of the brain play a role in rhythmic perception,
which is further complicated by the amount of musical training one has.
In his chapter
on rhythm, Jourdain states that in contrast to melody, “rhythmic skill favours the left brain”
(149). Furthermore, he asserts that rhythmic perception and harmonic perception
are favoured by different sides of the brain so that some musicians are
naturally better at tonality, while others are natural better at rhythm. This
thinking is analogous to the older notion that some people are more right brain
dominant, while others are more left brain dominant. While it may often be the
case that some people are more naturally talented at rhythm than others, it
could be suggested that this has to do in large part with deficits in their
musical training, their specific musical enculturation, and a tendency in music
education to emphasize rhythmic training and melodic training separately. Furthermore, several recent studies
show that rhythmic perception utilizes both hemispheres of the brain, and so
this issue may not be as simple as Jourdain suggests.
In the study Passive Rhythm Perception in Musicians,
it was discovered that in both the musician and non-musician test groups, a
basic network for processing the quantized rhythms was activated. This “may
reflect an innate musical competence that is independent of training” (Limb et.
al., 386). This finding also helps to clarify previous studies regarding the
contributions of the right hemisphere to rhythm processing. It was found that
formal musical training does not lead to a decrease in right-sided activity in
terms of rhythmic processing, but that formal training activates additional
areas of the brain. Thus, musicians “utilized an analytic mode of processing
concentrated in the left hemisphere” (Limb et. al., 388). This is corroborated
by Jun who found that “playing music professionally develops analytical
processes in the left hemisphere, whereas other individuals process music in
their right hemispheres” (Jun). Thus, musical training shows a heightened use
of the left hemisphere in the perception and performance of rhythm.
The brain’s
perception of rhythm can also be dependent on what music we are listening to
and whether that music has a constant groove or not. For example, “studies have
pointed to regions in the brain, such as the basal ganglia and supplementary
motor areas, which are activated during listening to music with a beat
structure versus music without a regular beat structure” (Phillips-Silver,
299). In other words, the innate heartbeat of music triggers areas in the brain
that music without a regular beat does not. Furthermore, some researchers have
studied the connections between movement and music, and the effect of that
movement on our rhythmic perception. The goal of one such study was to explore
the effects of movement on our bilateral perception of rhythm. Based on the
fMRI data that was collected, it was found that “a bilateral network of motor
areas is activated when rhythms are perceived, even when no movement is made”
(Brett & Grahn, 902). These findings are supported by a number of other
studies which confirm that “a bilateral network of motor areas mediate
perception of rhythm in addition to rhythmic production” (Brett & Grahn,
902). As a result of these findings, it is clear that rhythm is not localized to
just one side of the brain. The perception and production of rhythm is complex
and utilizes the whole brain in a fluid way depending on the types of rhythm,
their complexity, and a person’s level of musical training. Later in his
chapter on rhythm, through a discussion of how musical perception is altered as
a result of brain injuries, Jourdain clarifies his position by stating “rhythmic
ability is clearly much less localized than harmonic skill” (Jourdain, 151).
This further supports the idea that our perception of rhythm activates more
areas of the brain than traditional thinking may suggest.
Based on this
research, it is clear that rhythm is perceived in a bilateral way, in both
hemispheres of the brain. The way in which the brain perceives rhythm is
further complicated by the metrical complexity of the rhythm, the existence of
a regular beat structure, and how much musical training an individual has. Recognizing
the fact that rhythmic and melodic perception and performance aren’t localized
to one hemisphere of the brain has strong implications for music education. In
terms of skill acquisition, tonal abilities and rhythmic abilities can’t be
seen as separate and distinct. Melody and rhythm must be taught in a holistic
way and not seen as two distinct entities that some have natural aptitude for,
and others do not. Connecting music to movement in a non-Western way allows for
rhythm to be grounded, internalized and made a whole-body pursuit – not just a
cognitive function of the brain.
Works Cited
Grahn, Jessica A., and Matthew Brett.
"Rhythm and Beat Perception in Motor Areas of
the
Brain." Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience 19.5 (2007): 893-906.
Jourdain, Robert. Music, The Brain, And Ecstasy. New York: HarperCollins, 1997. Print.
Jun, Passion. "Music, Rhythm and The
Brain." Brain World. N.p., 7 Mar. 2011. Web. 26
Oct. 2013. <http://brainworldmagazine.com/music-rhythm-and-the-brain-2/>.
Oct. 2013. <http://brainworldmagazine.com/music-rhythm-and-the-brain-2/>.
Limb, Charles J., Stefan Kemeny, Eric B.
Ortigoza, Sherin Rouhani, and Allen R. Braun.
"Left Hemispheric Lateralization of Brain Activity during Passive Rhythm
Perception in Musicians." The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in
Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 288A.4 (2006): 382-89
"Left Hemispheric Lateralization of Brain Activity during Passive Rhythm
Perception in Musicians." The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in
Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 288A.4 (2006): 382-89
Phillips-Silver, Jessica. "On the Meaning of
Movement in Music, Development and the
Brain." Contemporary Music
Review 28.3 (2009): 293-314. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.
1 comment:
Dear Will, I know this is an old post, but I wonder if you could comment on Jourdain's notion that rhythm is preferentially lateralized in the left hemisphere and melody in the right. This seems, prima facie, very simplistic to me, and perhaps wrong altogether in one key aspect: namely that melody and rhythm are inextricably linked. If you change the temporal pattern of a sequence of musical tones, you transform the perceived melody into a different one altogether, or even disintegrate it into a sequence that cannot hang together as a perceived melody.
Post a Comment