Source
The Musical
Brain. Dir. Christina
Pochmursky. Perf. Dr. Daniel Levitin, Sting. Canadian Television (CTV), 2009. http://www.veoh.com/watch/v2067939348aKHTtY?h1=The+Musical+Brain
Summary
This documentary explores why the love of music is universal.
It does touch on other musical studies, but this entry is solely based on Dr.
Levitin’s study of a master musician’s brain.
Dr. Daniel Levitin at McGill University, was a musician and
producer before deciding to enter into the realm of neuroscience. He was
interested in studying the brain of master musicians. When Sting was in Montreal,
he agreed to have Dr. Levitin study his brain in a MRI machine. Dr. Levitin
conducted a study with three steps:
1. Dr. Levitin named a song and Sting had to imagine the song as vividly as possible in his head.
2. Dr. Levitin played a clip of music through headphones and Sting had to listen and enjoy.
3. Sting was asked to compose a melody and lyrics for a new piece that he has never thought of before.
When Sting came to perform in Toronto, Dr. Levitin discussed
the results with Sting. Dr. Levitin first began by telling Sting that his brain
structure was normal. The first step of the study showed that even when Sting
was asked to imagine a song playing, the musician’s brain was fully engaged and
his visual cortex was activated. The second step of the study showed that when
Sting knew the piece, the brain could predict what was coming up, but when he
was not familiar with the piece, the brain was not as active. When Sting was
asked to compose a melody and lyrics, the caudate was
activated indicating that the brain was planning physical movements to the rhythm
which was being perceived. The corpus callosum, which transfers data between
the two hemispheres, was also activated. This was rarely seen in amateur
musicians and non-musicians before, as they typically use the right side of the
brain to process pitch and the left side of the brain for language. The better
the musician, the more it spreads out between the two hemispheres.
Sting comments on how he is a visual person and when he
listens to Bach, he can see beautiful architecture, massive chambers and
palaces and imagines the space where the music is played. He also mentions how
he has to keep an external metronome with his head or his foot when he is performing
music. After receiving the analysis, Sting states how it is both fascinating
and disturbing that a logical analysis is given to such a creative process.
Reflection
Dr. Levitin’s first step of the study on imagining a song
even without hearing it is very powerful because it studies what musicians can
hear in our head is based on memory. Not only are we recalling the melodic
line, but there is also rhythm, harmony, instrumental texture, timbre quality
and the emotional feeling that it evokes within ourselves. Depending on our
learning strategies – visual, aural or kinaesthetic, our brain will imagine the
music from that area of the brain. In Sting’s situation, he was a visual
learner, which allowed him to visual many images while he was imaging a piece
of music. If they were an auditory learner, they would be hearing vibrations,
instrumentation and tone qualities, while a kinaesthetic learner would feel
movement throughout their bodies.
The results from the second step of the study indicate that
the brain can predict information when it knows the piece of music. This does
not infer that the brain is not predicting information when it is not familiar
with the piece. I believe that our Western musical culture and influences has programmed
our brain to better predict future musical experiences. If a piece of music
from another culture was used in this study, results may differ.
As musicians, we are taught that rhythm is the basis and the
melody line is an additional layer to the rhythm. I found it quite interesting
that caudate was so lively when Sting was composing a melodic line. This may
mean that musicians who are actively engaged in the creative process plan the
body movement based on melody and rhythm.
As a teacher, we encourage our students to become more
creative by working through the creative process. I view the creative process as
something that naturally occurs from influences surrounding us. I wonder how the
brain’s reaction to music would differ if this same experiment was conducted on
students of varied ages learning musical instruments.
No comments:
Post a Comment