Cochlear implantation has been
found to be extremely effective in allowing otherwise deaf individuals to
develop speech comprehension; however there are some constraints to the success
of the technology. The ability of
children with cochlear implants to process complex sounds including auditory
information is limited, which can negatively affect their ability to
communicate at the same level as individuals with normal hearing. Most cochlear implant users are unable to
discriminate pitch, thus their ability to understand prosody in speech is
reduced. Such individuals therefore find
it difficult to understand emotional subtext in speech and to distinguish
between statements and questions. A lack of prosody comprehension can be even
more limiting for individuals who speak tonal languages, such as Mandarin. If prosody is not perceived, the basic
meaning of many words in these languages cannot be understood.
In a 2010 study, Japanese
children with cochlear implants were presented with a variety of recordings of
words spoken with different emotions. In
each recorded example amplitude, which is an important emotional cue for
cochlear implant users, was normalized. In the absence of varying amplitudes,
the cochlear implant using participants were unable to identify angry
utterances, often confusing them with happy utterances. Previous studies have
had similar results, demonstrating cochlear implant user’s challenges in perceiving
valence in speech. The also investigated
the production of vocal emotion in cochlear implant users. Children were instructed to imitate
exclamations of emotion and several simulations of animal sounds. Although the control group with normal
hearing performed surprisingly poorly on this test, the cochlear implant users
showed significantly more difficulty in imitating prosody. This suggests that perception of prosody is
instrumental in learning prosodic patterns (Nakata, 2010).
Although music therapy is already
being used to assist children with cochlear implants in improving their
auditory perception, very few studies have been completed to determine its
efficacy. Musical training has been
shown to enhance processing of speech prosody in children with normal hearing
as it can improve a child’s detection of rhythm and pitch, two vital components
of both speech and music. Several
ongoing studies are investigating the benefit of musical training in supporting
the development of speech prosody comprehension and production in cochlear
implant users. A study begun in 2009 at
the University of Helsinki in Finland is investigating how musical experience
affects the prosody perception and speech comprehension in children using
cochlear implants. The study is also investigating whether earlier implantation
positively affects a child’s musical engagement. Earlier musical engagement may
lead to higher success of musical therapy (Torppa, 2009).
A study at the Zürich University
Hospital is currently investigating the affect of rhythm training, pitch
training, and combined rhythm and pitch training on cochlear implant user’s speech
perception. The project integrates piano
playing, singing, and listening training, and is evaluating speech perception
through various tests that evaluate emotional perception, pitch-ranking, melody
and rhythm differentiation. The study is
also using PET scanning to monitor the cerebral blood flow in different
auditory brain areas during and after training.
The authors hope to provide some insight into the development of better
postoperative procedures to improve speech understanding in individuals with
cochlear implants (Peterson, 2009).
The University of Toronto is
collaborating with the Hospital for Sick Children to study the potential
benefit of voice lessons for cochlear implant users. The study integrates individual singing
instruction with singing and listening practice. The study may demonstrate
whether the development of motor skills involved in the physical production of
pitch in combination with ear training will improve pitch discrimination and
production (MacDonald, 2011).
As the success of the cochlear
implantation depends on both neuro-plasticity and postoperative therapies,
investigating the affect of music therapies in auditory comprehension in conjunction
with the therapies’ affect on the brain will be an important step toward
understanding the best postoperative procedures. The studies discussed above
are the first, small steps toward improvements in treatment of individuals with
cochlear implants.
Reflection:
The ability
to communicate effectively is a vital part of social integration and thus,
quality of life. Cochlear implants
provide one step towards helping some hearing impaired individuals communicate
with the hearing community. However,
quality of life is still greatly reduced when an individual is unable to
express or understand emotional subtext.
In worst possible case, the inability of cochlear implant users to
understand prosody could lead to a complete lack of communication, making full
social integration extremely difficult.
In some cases, music therapy is
already being used to supplement the natural learning process that occurs after
an individual receives a cochlear implant.
However, further research will need to demonstrate its objective value
if funding is to be secured in the future. If preliminary findings suggest music could
improve the communicative function of cochlear implant users, further research
may be able to develop the understanding of the link between speech and music. Most importantly, further research may better
equip caregivers and therapists to help their clients attain the best possible
quality of life.
If certain
pitch contours are associated with specific emotions in each language, could
musical training focusing on associating those intervals with each emotion
benefit post-operative therapy? Perhaps there are musical genres or composers
that innately used those prosodic pitch forms in their music to communicate
emotion. Does the use of these forms contribute to how our emotions are
affected by music? Not only would
further research in this area benefit cochlear implant users, but it would also
provide significant insight for understanding music.
Nakata,
Takayuki, Sandra E. Trehub, and Yukihiko Kanda. "Effect of cochlear implants
on children's perception and production of speech prosody." Journal of
the Acoustical Society of America 131.2 (2010): 1307-14. Web. 13 Nov. 2012.
Peterson,
Bjorn, Malene V. Mortensen, Albert Gjedde, and Peter Vusst.
"Reestablishing Speech Understanding through Musical Ear Training after
Cochlear Implantation: A Study of the Potential Cortical Plasticity in the
Brain." The Neurosciences and Music 1169 (2009): 437-40. Web. 13
Nov. 2012. <https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/18130979/Nyas_artikel_final.pdf>.
Torppa, Rivta, Miika Järvenpää , Minna Huotilainen,
Andrew Faulkner and Martti Vainio.
"Music related speech perception abilities in children with cochlear
implant devices; does music involvement affect other auditory domains?" Frontiers
Neuroscience Conference Abstract: Tuning the Brain for Music (2009). Web.
13 Nov. 2012.
<http://www.frontiersin.org/10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.02.030/event_abstract>.
2 comments:
For starters, having read more about the cochlea, it is amazing that something could be made by man to even remotely resemble it! The cochlea (the whole ear, in fact) seems to be one of the most complex systems in the body. And since this seems to be a rather new neuroprosthetic, and one which is seriously being researched, I think it will advance quickly.
One question that does come to mind is the general development of emotions. Are humans born with innate emotions, an innate ability to feel, or are emotions partially learnt through emotional interactions? If they are at all learnt, then cochlear implant children would be at a disadvantage. In any case, I feel that they would be emotionally immature as a result of their condition.
Another interesting observation came from being present when you, Suzanne, were talking to our mutual friend about Deaf culture. After discovering a little bit more about Deaf culture, I see that deaf people do not see their deafness as a disability. Thus cochlear implants would be considered as not accepting deafness as a positive condition. Therefore parents might choose not to have cochlear implants. It is true what you were saying, that people with cochlear implants might feel like they are in neither world- neither in the hearing world or the Deaf world. This was quite a revelation to me.
I think it is a very good idea, when working with cochlear implant users in post-operational therapies, to teach basic pitch contours of phrases through music. I think that being able to detect a minor 3rd would be essential for understanding speech prosody since we often go up or down a minor 3rd, relatively, in pitch at the ends of sentences to indicate a question or statement. However, I am guessing that it takes a fair amount of time to develop pitch differentiation and even more time to develop a concept of small intervals for these patients. I think it is a very worthwhile area of study! If cochlear implants are given to children, there should be a method for them to develop the speech prosody skills necessary to function in their society. I think it would be beneficial to study the main inflections/ intervals that each culture uses to inflect meaning in speech, and then base musical training off of this knowledge. I hope that research on this topic will continue!
Post a Comment